Evolution #2799
ferméOPE ADD and MODIF : we should have relations between operations
50%
Description
At first we should simply deals with hierarchical relations.
This for OPE add and modif, not compulsory
Mis à jour par Yann Le Jeune il y a plus de 9 ans
The relation should by typed, so we should have a new table with types of relations (phase, part, etc.)
This is very useful for old operation with separate documentation, different scientists etc. for one refenrece OPE (one OA in french administration)
Mis à jour par Étienne Loks il y a plus de 9 ans
- % réalisé changé de 0 à 50
- Statut changé de Nouveau à En cours
Managed in database and via admin
Mis à jour par Yann Le Jeune il y a environ 9 ans
Seems OK ? But not for search and results :
if we have operations included in another ope we should also have result for that OPE,
in search panel we should choose to have related ope results or only one ope (this for finds, context record, docs and ope search)
Mis à jour par Yann Le Jeune il y a environ 9 ans
This is also relevant for context-record inclusions.
May be the inclusive relation should be tagged in relation type ?
Mis à jour par Yann Le Jeune il y a presque 9 ans
We don't have inclusive search for CONTEXT RECORD or FINDS